Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 71
Filter
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(4): 503-512, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2287551

ABSTRACT

The immunogenicity and safety of vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unknown in patients with a history of pulmonary tuberculosis (OPTB). Therefore, the safety and effectiveness of inactivated vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) were assessed in patients with a history of PTB. The study cohort included 106 healthy controls and 93 adult patients with OPTB who received a two-dose vaccination. The study period was 21 to 105 days. Concentrations of antibodies (Abs) against receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG and SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing Abs (NAbs) were measured, in addition to the frequencies of SARS-CoV-2-specific B and a portion T cells. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the OPTB patients and healthy controls. No severe adverse events occurred. Concentrations of Abs against RBD-IgG and CoV-2 neutralizing Abs in addition to the frequencies of RBD-specific memory B cells proportions were lower in OPTB patients than the healthy controls (all, p < 0.05), while the frequencies of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4+) cells were higher (p = 0.023). There was no obvious correlation between age and blood concentrations of Abs against RBD-IgG and CoV-2 neutralizing Abs, while immune responses were similar in the fibrosis and calcification groups. The period of time following full-course vaccination and lymphocyte counts were associated to anti-RBD-IgG responses. Inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations were well tolerated in OPTB patients, although immunogenicity was limited in this population. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05043246).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/complications
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 130: 196-202, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the safety of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in early pregnant women in view of their adverse-effect profile and associated maternal-fetal complications, as well as to evaluate their immunogenicity. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, 232 women in their first trimester or those in the periconception period who inadvertently received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine between January 21, 2021, and January 14, 2022 were analyzed. Meanwhile, 735 unvaccinated early pregnancy women were also included in the study at a case-to-control ratio of 1:3. RESULTS: The vaccination group did not have an increased miscarriage rate compared with that of the control group (P = 0.918). Furthermore, the birth defect rates in the vaccine group and control group were 0.83% and 1.0%, respectively. Vaccination did not increase the risk of small for gestational age, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm, or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (P >0.01). Within 12 weeks after the second dose, the inactivated vaccine effectively produced neutralizing antibody (NAb) against SARS-CoV-2. The NAb levels in the paired umbilical cord serum and maternal serum samples during delivery were negative in both groups. The T-cell subset remained within the normal range in both groups. CONCLUSION: Therefore, our study proves that inactivated COVID-19 vaccines are safe for mothers and fetuses and also effective in producing NAb against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
3.
Front Immunol ; 14: 952911, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280358

ABSTRACT

Background: People with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) on anti-CD20 therapies (aCD20) and fingolimod have shown inadequate humoral responses to COVID-19 vaccines. Objective: The objective of the study was to pilot larger studies by demonstrating the safety and comparing the immunogenicity of different types of third doses in seronegative pwMS after two doses of BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine. Methods: In December 2021, subject to receiving their third dose, being COVID-19-naiive, and receiving no corticosteroid within two months, we measured the level of anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG in pwMS seronegative after two shots of BBIBP-CorV inactivated vaccine. Results: We included 20/29 pwMS who received adenoviral vector (AV), 7/29 who received inactivated, and 2/29 who received conjugated third doses. No serious adverse events were reported two weeks post-third dose. The pwMS receiving AV third doses showed significantly increased IgG concentrations, while only the ones not on aCD20 and fingolimod responded to inactivated third doses. An ordinal logistic multivariable generalized linear model indicated that age (per year ß: -0.10, P = 0.04), type of disease-modifying therapy (aCD20 ß: -8.36, P <0.01; fingolimod ß: -8.63, P = 0.01; others: reference), and type of third dose (AV or conjugated ß: 2.36, P = 0.02; inactivated: reference) are predictive of third dose immunogenicity among pwMS who remain seronegative after two shots of BBIBP-CorV vaccine. Statistical significance was not achieved for variables sex, MS duration, EDSS, duration of DMT, duration of third dose to IgG test, and duration from last aCD20 infusion to third dose. Conclusion: This preliminary pilot study highlights the need for further research to determine the optimal COVID-19 third dose vaccination strategy for pwMS living in areas where BBIBP-CorV vaccine has been used.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Pilot Projects , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
5.
Vaccine ; 41(5): 1003-1008, 2023 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2165938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several reports have been documented in possible association with the administration of different severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and central nervous system (CNS)demyelinating disorders, specifically post mRNA vaccines. We report twelve cases of developing Multiple sclerosis (MS) or Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) following neither the first nor second dose of inactivated or viral vector COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: We retrospectively compiled twelve patients' medical information with a new onset of MS or NMOSD in their first six weeks following a COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: We report twelve cases of MS (n = 9), clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)(n = 1), and NMOSD (n = 2) following COVID-19 inactivated vaccines (n = 11) or viral vector vaccines (n = 1), within some days following either the first (n = 3), second dose (n = 8), or third dose (n = 1). Their median age was 33.3 years, ranging from 19 to 53 years. Ten were women (83 %). All patients fully (n = 5) or partially (n = 2) recovered after receiving 3 doses of Corticosteroids. Common medications were Natalizumab, Teriflunomide, Dimethyl fumarate, and Rituximab. Also, Interferon beta 1-a was administered to one patient with severe symptoms of numbness. CONCLUSION: Our case series identifies the Sinopharm BBIBP-CorV and the AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccines as potential triggers for CNS demyelinating diseases. Vaccine administration routines are not affected by these rare and coincidental events. However, these manifestations are not deniable and require serious attention. Further investigations are needed to clarify the actual mechanisms and real associations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Demyelinating Diseases , Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
7.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 11(1): 2636-2644, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2121479

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTA wave of Omicron infections rapidly emerged in China in 2022, but large-scale data concerning the safety profile of vaccines and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection features in liver transplant (LT) recipients have not been collected. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the protectiveness and safety profile of the inactivated vaccines in LT patients against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant infections. A multi-centre retrospective study was conducted in a cohort with a history of liver transplantation. A total of 1881 participants (487 vaccinated and 1394 unvaccinated patients) were enrolled from seven centres in China. Fourteen of the participants were infected by Omicron, and 50% patients had over 14 days of viral shedding duration. The protection rate of COVID-19 vaccinations to Omicron was 2.59%. The three breakthrough infections occurred more than 6 months after fully vaccinated. A total of 96 (19.7%) vaccinated patients had adverse events, including fatigue, myalgia, liver dysfunction, swelling, and scleroma. There were more Grade 3 adverse events in the preoperative vaccination group than those in the postoperative vaccination group. Inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe in patients with post-liver transplantation. The efficacy of inactivated vaccines decreases after 6 months of vaccination, it is recommended that liver transplant patients get boosted vaccinations as early as possible even when they are fully vaccinated. Although clinical manifestations of Omicron infections were mild in LT patients, unvaccinated patients might have a higher risk of liver dysfunction during infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
8.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B ; 23(11): 899-914, 2022 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to observe the clinical and immune response characteristics of vaccinated persons infected with the delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Yangzhou, China. METHODS: We extracted the medical data of 129 patients with delta-variant infection who were admitted to Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (Yangzhou, China) between August and September, 2021. The patients were grouped according to the number of vaccine doses received into an unvaccinated group: a one-dose group and a two-dose group. The vaccine used was SARS-CoV-2-inactivated vaccine developed by Sinovac. We retrospectively analyzed the patients' epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data. RESULTS: Almost all patients with delta-variant infection in Yangzhou were elderly, and patients with severe/critical illness were over 70 years of age. The rates of severe/critical illness (P=0.006), fever (P=0.025), and dyspnea (P=0.045) were lower in the two-dose group than in the unvaccinated group. Compared to the unvaccinated group, the two-dose group showed significantly higher lymphocyte counts and significantly lower levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and D-dimer during hospitalization and a significantly higher positive rate of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies at admission (all P<0.05). The cumulative probabilities of hospital discharge and negative virus conversion were also higher in the two-dose group than in the unvaccinated group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of the SARS-CoV-2-inactivated vaccine were highly effective at limiting symptomatic disease and reducing immune response, while a single dose did not seem to be effective.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Critical Illness , Immunity , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects
9.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 72(9): 1792-1796, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2067712

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess adverse effects post-vaccination in healthcare professionals in the first vaccinated group against coronavirus disease-2019. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Indus Hospital, Badin, The prospective study was conducted at the vaccination unit of a university hospital in Tekirdag, Turkey, from January to February 2021, and comprised healthcare professionals who came for receiving the second dose of the coronavirus disease-2019 inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine 28 days after the first dose. Data was analysed using SPSS 18. RESULTS: Of the 1088 subjects, 714(65.6%) were female with mean age 29.85±9.2 years and 374(34.4%) were male with mean age 29.57±9.85 years. Overall, local pain in the vaccinated area 495(45.5%), fatigue 266(24.4%), headache 261(23.9%) and muscle pain 197(18.1%) were very common adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine was found to be safe.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
10.
Front Immunol ; 13: 923017, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2065503

ABSTRACT

Background: Vaccination remains the most effective measure to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and worse outcomes. However, many myasthenia gravis (MG) patients are hesitant to receive vaccine due to fear of worsening. Methods: MG patients were consecutively enrolled in two MG centers in North China. The "worsening" after vaccination was self-reported by MG patients, and severity was measured with a single simple question. The general characteristics and disease status immediately prior to the first dose were compared between the worsening and non-worsening groups. Independent factors associated with worsening were explored with multivariate regression analysis. Results: One hundred and seven patients were included. Eleven patients (10.3%) reported worsening after vaccination, including eight patients with mild or moderate worsening and three patients with severe worsening. Only one of them (0.9%) needed an escalation of immunosuppressive treatments. There were significant differences between the worsening and non-worsening groups in terms of Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classes immediately before the first dose and intervals since the last aggravation. Precipitating factors might contribute to the worsening in some patients. Logistic regression revealed that only interval since the last aggravation ≤6 months was associated with worsening after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (P = 0.01, OR = 8.62, 95% CI: 1.93-38.46). Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (an overwhelming majority were inactivated vaccines) were found safe in milder Chinese MG patients who finished two doses. Worsening after vaccination was more frequently seen in patients who were presumed as potentially unstable (intervals since last aggravation ≤6 months). However, mild worsening did occur in patients who were presumed to be stable. Precipitating factors should still be sought and treated for better outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Myasthenia Gravis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Myasthenia Gravis/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
11.
Front Immunol ; 13: 940715, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2055017

ABSTRACT

The world has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with unprecedented speed and vigor in the mass vaccination campaigns, targeted to reduce COVID-19 severity and mortality, reduce the pressure on the healthcare system, re-open society, and reduction in disease mortality and morbidity. Here we review the preclinical and clinical development of BBV152, a whole virus inactivated vaccine and an important tool in the fight to control this pandemic. BBV152, formulated with a TLR7/8 agonist adjuvant generates a Th1-biased immune response that induces high neutralization efficacy against different SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and robust long-term memory B- and T-cell responses. With seroconversion rates as high as 98.3% in vaccinated individuals, BBV152 shows 77.8% and 93.4% protection from symptomatic COVID-19 disease and severe symptomatic COVID-19 disease respectively. Studies in pediatric populations show superior immunogenicity (geometric mean titer ratio of 1.76 compared to an adult) with a seroconversion rate of >95%. The reactogenicity and safety profiles were comparable across all pediatric age groups between 2-18 yrs. as in adults. Like most approved vaccines, the BBV152 booster given 6 months after full vaccination, reverses a waning immunity, restores the neutralization efficacy, and shows synergy in a heterologous prime-boost study with about 3-fold or 300% increase in neutralization titers against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Based on the interim Phase III data, BBV152 received full authorization for adults and emergency use authorization for children from ages 6 to 18 years in India. It is also licensed for emergency use in 14 countries globally. Over 313 million vaccine doses have already been administered in India alone by April 18th, 2022.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Toll-Like Receptor 7 , Vaccine Development , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
12.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 64: e56, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2054630

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers, the elderly and other vulnerable populations were the first to receive COVID-19 vaccines in public health programs. There were few vaccine safety data available on the elderly. This observational study aimed to evaluate the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) safety in the elderly, at the beginning of the vaccination program, in Sao Paulo city, Brazil. The elderly people that received CoronaVac at the Reference Center for Special Immunobiologicals (CRIE) or at home, administered by the Interdisciplinary Home Care Team (NADI) of the Hospital das Clinicas were invited to participate in this phase 4 observational study. The vaccination schedule included two CoronaVac doses 28 days apart. The information on solicited and unsolicited adverse events following immunization were collected by phone calls on days 4 and 8 after each vaccine dose. We enrolled 158 adults aged 65 to 101 years (mean of 84.1 years); 63.9% were females and 95.6% had chronic conditions, 21.5% had moderate or severe impairment in daily living activities; 34.2% were pre-frail and 19.6% were frail. We were able to contact 95.6% and 91.6% of the vaccinated people, after the first and second doses, respectively; 31.8% and 23.4% of the contacted participants reported some adverse events (AE) following the first and second doses, respectively. Pain at the injection site, fatigue, myalgia and headaches were the most frequent solicited AE. Most AE were mild to moderate. There were eight severe adverse events, but none of them were considered related to the vaccine. The CoronaVac was safe and well tolerated by these adults of advanced age with frailty and comorbidities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral , Brazil , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Watchful Waiting
13.
Vaccine ; 40(39): 5701-5708, 2022 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1996613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To mitigate a national shortage of WIBP-CorV COVID-19 vaccine, China's regulator approved administering BBIBP-CorV after WIBP-CorV for completion of a primary series. In a pragmatic observational study, we compared immunogenicity and safety of a primary series of WIBP-CorV followed by BBIBP-CorV with a primary series of two doses of BBIBP-CorV. METHODS: We invited healthy 18-59-years-old adults who had already received either WIBP-CorV or BBIBP-CorV as their first dose in a primary series to participate in this observational cohort study. Subjects who had received WIBP-CorV as their first dose became the observation group; subjects who had received BBIBP-CorV as their first dose became the control group. All participants received BBIBP-CorV as their second dose. We obtained sera 1, 2, and 6 months after second doses for nAb titer measurement by micro-neutralization cytopathic effect assay with SARS-CoV-2 strain HB01, standardized with WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin. Safety was assessed for the 7 days after administration of second doses. RESULTS: Between March and December 2021, 275 subjects were included in the observation group and 133 in the control group. Neutralizing seropositivity (≥1:4) rates were 98.91 % and 99.25 % at 1 month and 53.16 % and 70.69 % at 6 months. One-month geometric mean titers (GMTs) were 21.33 and 22.45; one-month geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) were 227.71 IU/mL and 273.27 IU/mL. One to two months after vaccination, observation group seropositivity rates and titers were not significantly different to the control group's. Adverse reaction rates were 11.27 % and 18.80 %, all mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Both primary series were immunogenic; immunogenicity of WIBP-CorV followed by BBIBP-CorV was not different than immunogenicity following two doses of BBIBP-CorV for two months after vaccination; safety profiles were acceptable for both regimens. BBIBP-CorV can be used to complete a primary series that started with WIBP-CorV.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Young Adult
14.
Vaccine ; 40(39): 5657-5663, 2022 09 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1996611

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a serious healthcare problem worldwide since December 2019. The third dose of heterologous vaccine was recently approved by World Health Organization. The present study compared the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of the reduced and standard third booster dose of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine in adults who previously received the two-dose CoronaVac vaccine. Results showed that headache, joint pain, and diarrhea were more frequent in the 15 µg- than the 30 µg-BNT162b2 groups, whereas joint pain and chilling were more frequent in the 100 µg- than the 50 µg-mRNA-1273 groups. No significant differences in immunogenicity were detected. These findings demonstrate that the reduced dose of the mRNA vaccines elicited antibody responses against the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants that were comparable to the standard dose. The reduced dose could be used to increase vaccine coverage in situations of limited global vaccine supply.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , Arthralgia , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(8): e2226236, 2022 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1990379

ABSTRACT

Importance: Kawasaki disease (KD) symptoms significantly overlap with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children due to COVID-19. Patients with KD may be at risk for adverse outcomes from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Objective: To describe the outcomes of patients with KD to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series evaluated 2 cohorts using an existing KD database and reviewed individual electronic medical records for the period spanning January 1, 2020, through January 31, 2022, via electronic medical records that include Washington state immunization records. Vaccine cohort inclusion criteria consisted of being 21 years or younger at immunization and receiving 1 or more BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or messenger RNA (mRNA)-1273 (Moderna) vaccine doses. The COVID-19 cohort included patients 21 years or younger with positive polymerase chain reaction or nuclear capsid IgG findings for SARS-CoV-2. Participants included 826 patients from a preexisting KD database. One hundred fifty-three patients received at least 1 BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine dose and were included in the mRNA vaccine cohort. Thirty-seven patients had positive test results for SARS-CoV-2 and were included in the COVID-19 cohort. Exposures: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and/or infection. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adverse events after mRNA vaccination and/or COVID-19, including clinician visits, emergency department encounters, or hospitalizations. Results: Among the 153 patients included in the mRNA vaccination cohort (mean [SD] age, 13.0 [4.3] years; 94 male [61.4%]), the BNT162b2 vaccine was provided for 143 (93.5%), and the remaining 10 (6.5%) received mRNA-1273 or a combination of both. Among patients in the vaccine cohort, 129 (84.3%) were fully vaccinated or received a third-dose booster. No clinically severe adverse events occurred, and there were no reports of vaccine-related hospitalizations or outpatient visits. The COVID-19 cohort included 37 patients (mean [SD] age, 11.0 [5.5] years; 22 male [59.5%]). No patients required hospitalization due to COVID-19. The most common symptoms included low-grade fever, fatigue, cough, and myalgia with resolution within a few days. Two patients, aged 9 and 19 years, had extended cough and fatigue for 3 to 4 weeks. One patient developed COVID-19 within 6 weeks of receiving intravenous immunoglobulin for KD. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the mRNA vaccines may be safe and COVID-19 may not be severe for patients with a history of KD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Viral Vaccines , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Adolescent , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Child , Cough/etiology , Fatigue/etiology , Humans , Male , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , mRNA Vaccines
16.
Iran J Kidney Dis ; 16(4): 269-271, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1989819

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being administered worldwide. Most of the reported side effects are mild and self-limiting with few reported cases of severe adverse reactions. Here we report a case of acute cellular rejection in a kidney transplant recipient following vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. fifty- one years old man with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, who had received a kidney transplantation from a living related donor, 3 years ago, presented with an impaired kidney function seven days after receiving the first dose of Sinovac's COVID-19 vaccine. Kidney transplant biopsy revealed acute cellular rejection. The allograft function completely recovered after treatment with steroids. The analysis and investigation of the complications and adverse reactions induced by anti-COVID-19 vaccines, could increase our understanding of the underlying pathogenesis.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6915.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Graft Rejection/chemically induced , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Vaccination , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
17.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2087412, 2022 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984956

ABSTRACT

This article describes the results of a preclinical safety and immunogenicity study of QazCovid-in®, the first COVID-19 vaccine developed in Kazakhstan, on BALB/c mice, rats, ferrets, Syrian hamsters and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). The study's safety data suggests that this immunobiological preparation can be technically considered a Class 5 nontoxic vaccine. The series of injections that were made did not produce any adverse effect or any change in the general condition of the model animals' health, while macroscopy and histology studies identified no changes in the internal organs of the BALB/c mice and rats. This study has demonstrated that a double immunization enhances the growth of antibody titers as assessed by the microneutralization assay (MNA) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in a pre-clinical immunogenicity test on animal models. The best GMT results were assessed in MNA and ELISA 7 days after re-vaccination; however, we noted that GMT antibody results in ELISA were lower than in MNA. A comparative GMT assessment after the first immunization and the re-immunization identified significant differences between model animal groups and a growth of GMT antibodies in all of them; also, differences between the gender groups were statistically significant. Moreover, the most marked MNA immune response to the QazCovid-in® vaccine was seen in the Syrian hamsters, while their SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody activity as assessed with ELISA was the lowest.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Cricetinae , Mice , Animals , Humans , Rats , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Macaca mulatta , Mesocricetus , Ferrets , Antibodies, Viral , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , China , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Antibodies, Neutralizing
18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2090176, 2022 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956538

ABSTRACT

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are considered to be a high-risk population for infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations (ICVs) was described as more effective than 95%. Despite this, no data on the immunogenicity and safety of the ICV in Han race stable RD patients in China. In this study, we sought to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the ICVs in RD patients in South China. A total of 80 adult stable RD patients were recruited. Following 14-35 days of immunization, cheiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) were utilized to detect antibodies titers. An investigation into the relative parameters on the immunogenicity response to vaccination was carried out using logistic regression analysis. Compared to the HC group, the positive response of IgG and Nab in RD patients were lower than those in healthy control (HC) (P = .040 and P < .0001, respectively) after two doses of ICV were inoculated. The use of methotrexate (P = .016) and prednisolone (P = .018), and the level of red blood cell distribution width-C (RDW-C) (P = .035) and C-reactive protein (P = .015) were independently associated with lower rises in the magnitude of COVID-19 vaccine antibodies. No vaccine-related serious adverse reactions were observed in either group. After receiving two doses of ICVs, the production of protective antibodies in stable RD patients treated with immunosuppressive agents may decrease. It was discovered that ICVs were safe and well tolerated by RD patients.


What is the context?There are currently no accessible data on the efficacy and safety of inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations in South China RD patients who are receiving immunosuppressive medications.What is new?Inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations were immunogenic in stable RD patients in our investigation. No significant adverse reactions to the vaccination were seen in either group. No disease flares were observed in our study.What is the impact?Inactivated COVID-19 vaccinations are immunogenic and safe in stable RD patients in China, according to the findings of this study. The use of methotrexate or prednisolone, the RDW-C level, and the CRP level may all have an effect on the development of protective antibodies following vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Adult , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Vaccination , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Antibodies, Viral , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
19.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 476, 2022 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is a key intervention to prevent COVID-19. Many vaccines are administered globally, yet there is not much evidence regarding their safety and adverse effects. Iran also faces this challenge, especially as data regarding the Sputnik V vaccine is sparse. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the adverse effects of the most commonly used vaccines in Iran. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort study design, 6600 subjects aged 18 years or older who had received two doses of any of the three COVID-19 vaccines (Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, and Sputnik V) were selected using a random sampling method between March and August 2021. Subjects were asked about any adverse effects of the vaccines by trained interviewers via telephone interview. Vaccine-related adverse effects in individuals during the first 72 h and subsequently following both doses of the vaccines were determined. The demographic variables, type of administered vaccine, adverse effects, and history of the previous infection with COVID-19 were collected. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation) and analytical statistics (Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests) were performed at a 95% significance level using STATA software version 15 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS: From 6600 participants, 4775 responded (response rate = 72.3%). Of the participants, 1460 (30.6%) received the AstraZeneca vaccine, 1564 (32.8%) received the Sinopharm vaccine and 1751 (36.7%) received the Sputnik V vaccine. 2653 participants (55.56%) reported adverse effects after the first dose and 1704 (35.7%) after the second dose. Sputnik V caused the most adverse effects with 1449 (82.7%) vaccine recipients reporting symptoms after the first or second dose, compared with 1030 (70.5%) for AstraZeneca and only 585 (37.4%) for the Sinopharm vaccine. The most common adverse effects after the first dose were fatigue (28.37%), chill/fever (26.86%), and skeletal pain (22.38%). These three adverse effects were the same for the second dose, although their prevalence was lower. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate that the Sputnik V vaccine has the highest rate of adverse effects, followed by the AstraZeneca and Sinopharm vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines used in Iran are safe and there were no reports of serious adverse effects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/therapeutic use , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccines/adverse effects , Vaccines/therapeutic use , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects , Vaccines, Inactivated/therapeutic use , Vaccines, Synthetic/adverse effects , Vaccines, Synthetic/therapeutic use
20.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 21(12): 1873-1881, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1915425

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immunogenicity after the CoronaVac vaccine remains uncertain, especially regarding infections with the coronavirus variants of concern and waning immunity. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label clinical trial designed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, or BNT162b2 as the third vaccination. The key eligible criteria were individuals at least 18 years old who were fully vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac vaccine for 2-4 months. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of the total anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody post-vaccination compared with that pre-vaccination. The secondary endpoint was reactogenicity within 7 days. RESULTS: Forty-one participants received AZD1222, 40 received BBIBP-CorV, and 40 received BNT162b2. The GMC of anti-RBD antibody at 2 weeks post-vaccination was 31,138.67 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL for BNT162b2, 6,412.10 BAU/mL for AZD1222, and 1,092.7 BAU/mL for BBIBP-CorV. Compared with pre-vaccination, the ratio of anti-RBD concentration was 690.24 for BNT162b2, 130.02 for AZD1222, and 17.79 for BBIBP-CorV. No potentially life-threatening adverse reaction were observed within 7 days. CONCLUSION: A third vaccination with the heterologous vaccine, BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, or BNT162b2, can elicit a robust immune response, without serious adverse events in participants fully vaccinated with the CoronaVac vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Humans , Antibodies , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunity, Humoral , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Vaccines, Inactivated/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL